In the Grand Committee of the House of Lords on Monday 8th July, 2013 the below comments were made about Education (Amendment of the Curriculum Requirements) (England) Order 2013. I specifically draw your attention to those points highlighted in yellow below:
Lord Knight of Weymouth: My Lords, I draw the attention
of the Committee to my interests in this area. I am a trustee of the
e-Learning Foundation and have various other interests, including
working with the
Times Educational Supplement and with smart technologies. I am also a trustee of Apps for Good.
8 July 2013 : Column GC16
I,
too, attended the Bett conference at the beginning of last year, when
the Secretary of State, Michael Gove, who is now on his feet in the
other place talking about these issues, announced the disapplication of
the programme of study for ICT. I broadly welcomed that announcement. It
goes back to my dissatisfaction when I was Schools Minister with the
ICT curriculum, particularly at key stages 3 and 4, and to how
unengaging my son found the experience of doing the European Computer
Driving Licence. My attempt to change things was to get Jim Rose’s
primary curriculum review to include ICT as a core subject alongside
English and maths. It was a battle that I eventually won by subterfuge,
and Jim’s review included ICT at its core. I wanted young people
starting secondary school to be plug-and-play ready to use ICT across
the whole curriculum in their learning.
I
was also informed, as I think the Minister was, and as he mentioned in
his opening comments, by the changing nature of the labour market, which
is essentially hollowing out due to globalisation and technological
change. The growth in high-skill, high-wage work is at the higher end of
the market and is very much informed by technology and people who are
confident with it. Not all of it requires programming skill. Therefore,
my first question is: how will the Minister ensure that digital skills
remain across the whole curriculum and inform the way in which young
people learn in all subjects, not just in the subject called computing?
I
cannot see any occupation where we will not require people to be
confident in using the internet and technology, and to have a basic
understanding of how it works. I am chair of the Online Centres
Foundation, which just today was renamed the Tinder Foundation. We are
very active in digital inclusion, and we see people referred to us from
jobcentres so that they can not just process a claim but apply for jobs,
because 70% of employers require you to apply online. These are
fundamental skills for every child to learn in order to be confident
leaving school.
The
issue of digital skills across the curriculum raises an additional
question. It is a perhaps unfashionable question about pedagogy. As a
Minister, I was always slightly reluctant to get involved in pedagogy
because I am not a trained teacher. However, I regret that, and I have
looked at the amount of investment that has gone into technology in
schools over time and have seen that some of it was not spent well,
because not every teacher was taught to be confident in using it, and to
shift their pedagogy in order to use it well.
I
have that worry about 3D printers, and I am specifically interested in
finding out from the Minister whether, as 3D printers land in schools,
they are not going to be used to prop doors open or get dusty in
cupboards.
Last Friday I was talking to teachers from the Isle of
Portland Aldridge Community Academy down in Dorset following their being
shortlisted for a TES Schools Award. Unfortunately the school did not
manage to win an award, but it is worth noting that both the nominated
projects involved 3D printers, so I can see that some fantastic pedagogy
may emerge from this technology that encourages highly engaged teaching
and learning.
For a full copy of the handsard please refer to - http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201314/ldhansrd/text/130708-gc0001.htm#13070816000186